
Sets expectations
Every invite says how long it takes, who decides and when they’ll hear back.
Talkround · First-round interviews
Talkround asks every applicant the same few questions, by voice or in writing, whenever it suits them. Your team gets a ranked shortlist with the evidence behind every score. A person makes every decision.
Free to try with one role. No card, no sales call.
A recruiter skims 240 CVs, books 30 phone screens and asks the same five questions thirty times. The best candidate accepts a faster offer on Thursday.
An illustrative week, not measured results

Every invite says how long it takes, who decides and when they’ll hear back.

The same structured questions for everyone, by voice or text. No countdown.

Each rubric level links to the words that earned it. No mystery numbers.

Strong, borderline and weak go to different queues. Every decision is a person’s.

A warm, specific no, sent only after a person reads the transcript.
Pick four questions and a rubric with plain-English levels. Set the guardrails. It takes about as long as writing the job post.
Candidates answer when it suits them, by voice or in writing, with no timer and a chance to edit before sending.
Each answer gets a rubric level and a quote. The report lists what was not used: name, face, accent, tone of voice.
Advance, keep in review or decline. A decline needs a person to read the transcript first, then a warm message goes out.
Role setup
Candidate interview
Score report
ShortlistEach answer is matched to skills, and each skill to plain-English levels. Follow one answer from the question to the evidence to the level it earned.
Talkround suggests. People decide. Nothing leaves the building without someone reading it.
Above the line and nothing flagged. A person confirms, then a booking link goes out.
Borderline scores, short answers, audio trouble, an adjustment or a logistics question. No suggestion until someone has looked.
Sent only after a person reads the transcript, with one specific strength and an offer of feedback.
The shortlist moves into the tools you use. Example integrations for this concept.
Advanced candidates move to “Team interview”, with the score report attached.
Candidates pick a slot from the panel’s shared availability.
One daily message when reports are waiting for a person.
Levels, quotes and the reason for every suggestion. If you disagree, you can see exactly where.

An AI in hiring has to earn trust from both sides. These rules are built into the product, and the first three can’t be switched off.
Try it on a real opening. If it doesn’t save your team time, you’ll know within a week. Sample pricing model
No. It asks the questions, transcribes and drafts notes against your rubric. A person advances, reviews or declines every candidate, and a decline can’t be sent until someone has read the transcript.
Only the words of each answer, against the rubric you wrote. It never sees a face, and it doesn’t use name, age, accent, tone of voice or answer format.
Yes, on any question, and they can ask for extra time on the invite. The format is never an input to the score.
Structured questions, quoted evidence and human decisions come first. Every month, score averages are compared across groups using voluntary, anonymous self-ID, and a gap over 0.3 opens a review of the questions.
In this concept, shortlists sync to your ATS stages, calendars and Slack. A real product would list each supported tool by name, with what syncs and what doesn’t.
Answers are kept for the role only and deleted after six months, unless the candidate agrees to be considered for other roles. Candidates can ask for a copy or deletion at any time.
This is an estimate, not a result. Assumptions: today, 6 minutes to skim each CV and a 25-minute phone screen for 15% of applicants. With Talkround, 60% of applicants complete the interview; a person reads 25% of those reports in full (8 minutes each) and skims the rest (1 minute each). Setup time isn’t included.